The Cincinnati-Middletown metropolitan area ranks in the middle of a group of America’s fastest-recovering cities, according to a recent list by Forbes magazine.
Forbes put it at No. 55 of 100 recovering metropolitan statistical areas in the U.S. — formed using September unemployment rates, the gross metropolitan product change between first and second quarter of 2009 and foreclosure rates as of September. The magazine also compared 2008 and 2009 housing prices, and the average length of time properties on sale remain on the market.
The Cincinnati-Middletown area is listed at 63rd concerning GMP, 60th in foreclosure and 53rd in unemployment. But it ranks 40th in home prices and 26th in sales rate, according to Forbes.
Mike Robinette, Middletown’s economic development director, said he is glad Forbes gave the region a somewhat favorable spot on the list, but noted he does not put much stock in analysis based on “narrow pieces of data.”
“I don’t put a lot of credibility in studies that draw broad, general conclusions about how all of those regions compare to each other in terms of recovery based on four or five pieces of data,” Robinette said. “It’s a good way to sell magazines, but it doesn’t really mean anything in terms of what we’re doing on a day-to-day basis to create jobs in Middletown.”
Mike Juengling, Butler County’s development director, said he thinks the mid-range rank points to the region’s stability during relatively unstable times.
“We’re always near the middle,” Juengling said. “We have a number of people living in the area that are on the upper end of the middle class and there are quite a few people getting back to work who can afford to buy houses. That’s probably a big factor.”
Other Ohio MSAs making the list include Columbus at 47, Cleveland at 60, Akron at 73, Dayton at 89 and Toledo at 92.
Start your day with top headlines in your inbox and get breaking news e-mail alerts at any time by subscribing to our Headlines e-mail newsletter.
See Sample | Privacy Policy
8:24 AM, 12/8/2009
7:43 AM, 12/8/2009
3:48 PM, 12/7/2009
1:08 PM, 12/7/2009
12:46 PM, 12/7/2009