The Adobe Flash Player is required to view this multimedia interactive. Get it here.

AK Steel paying $51M to retirees

Funds part of a lawsuit involving retirees who received lump sum pension payments.

SunCoke receives permit from Ohio EPA
New 6 min. ago
Former Butler County girl on Sports Illustrated cover
3:02 p.m.
Weather prompts closings, postponements
2:32 p.m.
Psych evaluation ordered for teen accused of raping 64-year-old woman
2:26 p.m.
Road crews working to clear streets as more snow predicted
2:24 p.m.
> More headlines

By Jessica Heffner, Staff Writer Updated 9:59 PM Monday, November 30, 2009

WEST CHESTER TWP. — More than $51 million is on its way to a group of AK Steel retirees after the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the company’s calculation method violated federal pension laws.

The funds were distributed Nov. 25 as part of an eight-year case involving 965 retirees who elected to be paid a lump sum for their pension, according to attorneys for the retirees. A federal judge decided the company was improperly calculating lump-sum distributions.

On April 1, 2009, AK paid the $51.5 million ordered by the court from the AK Steel Master Pension Trust into an approved account. The payment ended the company’s “liability to the class members pursuant to the judgment in this matter, including with respect to interest which accrues on the judgment,” according to AK Steel’s first quarter 2009 10-Q filing.

Beyond the filing, spokesman Alan McCoy said the company had no further comment on the case.

Workers involved in the case include whose employment ended on or after Jan. 1, 2005 and received their lump-sum payment on or before April 1, 2005, according to court documents.

The judgment is payable to any company retiree from Armco or AK Steel who met the class definition, not just those who worked at Middletown Works, said Bob Gary, an attorney with Gary, Naegele and Theado, the Lorain, Ohio, law firm that handled the case.

The case was threatened by revisions to the Pension Protection Act of 2006, which set guidelines for the calculation of lump-sum pension payments. AK Steel argued that any payment it made would be a distribution made after Aug. 17, 2006, when PPA was signed into law and was therefore subject to the new guidelines.

However, the court upheld that the act is not retroactive, which is what U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, and others maintained during the case, according to a letter written by Brown and several other members of Congress to the Secretary of the Treasury in August 2007.

“The bottom line is we got 100 cents on the dollar for the pensioners even after any fees,” Gary said.

The law firm is litigating a similar pension case involving the local steelmaker, Lintner vs. AK Steel Corp., filed March in the Ohio Southern District Court. Gary said he expects a conclusion soon.

Contact this reporter at (513) 705-2843 or jheffner@coxohio.com.

Share this article

ADD COMMENT

Comments feed

Maybe that's true, but you are still putting a select few into one box. There are decent hard working men out there and it is unfair to put them into the sleeze catagory. Not every man drinks and cheats on his wife.

CASE
10:42 AM, 12/2/2009

REPORT ABUSE

Well Case, If I was lied to then why wouldn't they lie to their spouses?

barmaid
7:40 AM, 12/2/2009

REPORT ABUSE

Hey Barmaid, Bet you can't say that you met the love of your life at 13, started dating at 15, married at 18 and have been HAPPILY married for 34 years. I have more "clue" in my little finger than you do in your whole body. Maybe if you would stay out of the bars, you would see there is decent hard working men out there. You are seeing a select few. Did you ever once wonder, maybe you were being lied to.

CASE
6:58 PM, 12/1/2009

REPORT ABUSE

Actually Ted, it was decided by the court of appeals. So there is no more appealing. Done and done!

Don't think so
11:31 AM, 12/1/2009

REPORT ABUSE

I wonder if the estates of deceased retirees will be awarded part of this settlement? As my Father, God rest his soul; put 37 yrs in at the Asbestosis Infested Factory!!!

PaPo
8:58 AM, 12/1/2009

REPORT ABUSE

There are 39 additional comments

SHOW ALL

We welcome your comments. Please remember this is a public forum and behave appropriately. Your comments must conform to our visitor's agreement.