The Adobe Flash Player is required to view this multimedia interactive. Get it here.

Commentary: Buckeyes seem to have all the luck

OSU's Meyer chooses North Carolina's Withers to assist team

Frazier’s home run lifts Reds to 5th straight win
10:20 a.m.
Spartans head to regional final
5/24/12
Fenwick’s tourney run ends in regional semis
5/24/12
2 Middie jumpers qualify for state
5/24/12
College baseball: Miami tops Toledo in MAC tourney
5/23/12
> More sports headlines

By Jim Litke, Associated Press 11:15 PM Wednesday, December 21, 2011

What are the chances Ohio State Athletic Director Gene Smith was laughing out loud when he composed his response to the additional sanctions heaped on his school by the NCAA?

“We are surprised and disappointed by the NCAA’s decision,” his statement read. “However, we have decided not to appeal the decision because we need to move forward as an institution.”

Based on the kid-gloves treatment afforded the Buckeyes, that shouldn’t be a problem. Ohio State had already offered to vacate the 2010 season, return bowl money, go on two years of NCAA probation and use five fewer football scholarships over the next three years. On Tuesday, the NCAA tacked on a year of probation, took away four additional scholarships and imposed a one-year bowl ban. Even combined, those penalties are roughly half as severe as those the NCAA dropped on Southern California in June 2010.

A comparison of the cases is instructive. At USC, Heisman trophy-winning running back Reggie Bush and basketball star O.J. Mayo were found to have pocketed thousands of dollars in improper benefits from agents. The bigger sin, though, appears to have been the Trojans’ decision to be less than cooperative when NCAA investigators began snooping around the program and downright defiant when the enforcement people issued veiled threats. As a result, the NCAA leveled the dreaded “lack of institutional control” against USC, banned the Trojans from postseason play for two years and docked them 30 scholarships for the next three.

In Ohio State’s case, five players swapped jerseys, rings and assorted memorabilia for thousands in cash and tattoos, former coach Jim Tressel learned of the exchanges in April 2010, and not only kept the news to himself, but lied about it to his superiors or the NCAA on four separate occasions. There is no better example of lack of institutional control than what Ohio State’s clueless president, E. Gordon Gee, said in the middle of the unfolding scandal, when he and Smith tried to staunch the damage last March by suspending Tressel for two meaningless games and fining him $250,000: “I’m just hopeful the coach doesn’t dismiss me.”

But it got better. Barely 10 days later, Tressel’s suspension was extended to five games and by the end of May, he was forced out. In July, Ohio State half-heartedly punished itself and in August appeared before the NCAA’s Committee on Infractions. Then we learned that months after the original scandal made headlines, nine players got paid by a longtime booster for showing up at charity events and cozy summer jobs. By November, the NCAA upgraded the notice of allegations to include “failure to monitor” and Ohio State offered to cut five scholarships.

But it got even better. For reasons that have yet to be explained, the NCAA’s enforcement staff stopped short of lack of institutional control charges. In the end, the school’s athletic department gave Tressel a hefty severance deal and nearly all of the blame and that was good enough for the NCAA. It slapped the once-beloved coach with a five-year “show-cause” order that likely means he’ll never coach in college again.

In the coming months, North Carolina and Miami (Fla.) will face the infractions committee for scandals that are every bit as juicy. And North Carolina and Miami would sign on the dotted line for the same deal Ohio State got in a heartbeat. Ohio State, after all, is hoping to start recovering from its disappointment with a trip to the Gator Bowl, despite a 6-6 record.

Share this article